Research Design

AO. doctoral research project and publically funding multinational project

AO: two cases of collaboration are analyzed: multi-national, publicly funded project bringing together research teams from Britain and Bangladesh and a...Read more

MICRO: What did the analyst choose to describe as collaboration?

Jentsch, Birgit, and Catherine Pilley. 2003. “Research Relationships between the South and the North: Cinderella and the Ugly Sisters?” Social Science & Medicine (1982) 57 (10): 1957–67.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. understanding of and sensitivity to cultural differences

AO: Analysts note that “understanding of and sensitivity to cultural differences and their impact on teamwork” is important but it is unclear what kinds of “culture” they mean… Seems

PRACTICES: What “best practices” does the analyst believe make for improved collaboration?

Hall, Kara L., Annie X. Feng, Richard P. Moser, Daniel Stokols, and Brandie K. Taylor. 2008. “Moving the Science of Team Science Forward: Collaboration and Creativity.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, The Science of Team Science, 35 .

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. readiness factors and assessments of productivity.

AO: The analysts note that the science of team science is currently in its nascent stage and that definitions are being debated. For example, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary

META: What discourses does the analyst consider/leverage to characterize/theorize collaboration at this research stage? (How) are histories and contextual factors pointed to as shaping the collaborations described here at this research stage?

Hall, Kara L., Annie X. Feng, Richard P. Moser, Daniel Stokols, and Brandie K. Taylor. 2008. “Moving the Science of Team Science Forward: Collaboration and Creativity.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, The Science of Team Science, 35 .

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. intellectual partners - "found reflexive subjects"

AO: A discursive risk in this analysis is the assumption of intellectual partners among “elite” communities. I think the example of “professionalized” Kibera research subjects who

DISCURSIVE RISKS: What are the epistemic assumptions of the analyst of collaboration?

Holmes, Douglas R., and George E. Marcus. 2008. “Collaboration Today and the Re-Imagination of the Classic Scene of Fieldwork Encounter.” Collaborative Anthropologies 1 (1): 81–101.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. deferral and critical consciousness

AO: A researcher who operates under the methodological premise of deferral allows for generative different collaborative confirgurations of ethnography (82).

NANO: What traits does the analyst believe make a good collaborator? Is the analyst interested in how the collaboration stabilizes or how it fails or shifts?

Holmes, Douglas R., and George E. Marcus. 2008. “Collaboration Today and the Re-Imagination of the Classic Scene of Fieldwork Encounter.” Collaborative Anthropologies 1 (1): 81–101.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

Search form